Message188974
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
eric.snow, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date |
2013年05月12日.04:31:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1368333110.23.0.889135313213.issue17934@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Mostly looks good to me, but I think I'd prefer that attempts to clear a running frame raise RuntimeError with an appropriate message.
I also wonder how this might relate to Eric Snow's proposal to reference the currently executing function from the frame object (see issue 12857). It seems to me that the "f_func" pointer in that patch could serve the same purpose as the "f_executing" boolean flag in this patch, while providing additional information about the execution context.
Some other possibly relevant traceback related resource management issues: issue 6116, issue 1565525, issue 9815 (picked up while searching for Eric's RFE above)
(We may want to add a "clear_frames" convenience method to tracebacks as well) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年05月12日 04:31:50 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, gvanrossum, pitrou, eric.snow |
| 2013年05月12日 04:31:50 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1368333110.23.0.889135313213.issue17934@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年05月12日 04:31:50 | ncoghlan | link | issue17934 messages |
| 2013年05月12日 04:31:49 | ncoghlan | create |
|