Message188845
| Author |
zach.ware |
| Recipients |
Todd.Rovito, amaury.forgeotdarc, ezio.melotti, loewis, python-dev, roger.serwy, terry.reedy, trent, zach.ware |
| Date |
2013年05月10日.16:00:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1368201643.64.0.626678372455.issue17883@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks for your response, Martin.
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Zach: Temporarily committing changes to test specific buildbot issues
> is fine
I suppose it would also be beneficial to get some output from the other bots which are *not* failing, to have something to compare with. In that case, here's a (very) temporary patch we can try for a round of builds.
> asking the slave operator for direct access to the machine
> may also work.
Trent, what's your policy on letting non-committers play around in your machines? :) Alternately, do you know of anything about that machine that could be causing the failures? |
|