Message188639
| Author |
jsafrane |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, jsafrane, pitrou |
| Date |
2013年05月07日.10:50:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1367923835.33.0.365068001702.issue17922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> First, have you seen the following message on that bug report:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue16602#msg177180
I'm reading it now... I searched for PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT in cmpi-bindings and both occurrences generated by SWIG and both look safe.
Is it hidden/wrapped by any other macro?
Sorry, I don't know much about python internals and extension development, I'm not author of cmpi-bindings.
And I'm attaching stack trace with --with-pydebug. Debugging with gdb is quite a problem, I have gdb linked with distribution Python 2.7.4 and it doesn't cooperate with my custom built python, which I have in LD_LIBRARY_PATH (so Pegasus gets the right one when loading providers). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年05月07日 10:50:36 | jsafrane | set | recipients:
+ jsafrane, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
| 2013年05月07日 10:50:35 | jsafrane | set | messageid: <1367923835.33.0.365068001702.issue17922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年05月07日 10:50:35 | jsafrane | link | issue17922 messages |
| 2013年05月07日 10:50:35 | jsafrane | create |
|