Message187695
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
barry, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, cben, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, jcea, lemburg, loewis, ncoghlan, pconnell, petri.lehtinen, r.david.murray, ssbarnea, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年04月24日.11:45:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1366803923.93.0.189136886201.issue7475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't see any point in merely bringing the codecs back, without any convenience API to use them. If I need to do
import codecs
result = codecs.getencoder("base64").encode(data)
I don't think people would actually prefer this over
import base64
result = base64.encodebytes(data)
I't (IMO) only the convenience method (.encode) that made people love these codecs. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年04月24日 11:45:24 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, lemburg, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, cben, ncoghlan, belopolsky, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, ssbarnea, flox, petri.lehtinen, pconnell |
| 2013年04月24日 11:45:23 | loewis | set | messageid: <1366803923.93.0.189136886201.issue7475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年04月24日 11:45:23 | loewis | link | issue7475 messages |
| 2013年04月24日 11:45:23 | loewis | create |
|