Message187384
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年04月19日.20:18:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1366402733.56.0.391953444227.issue17742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
_PyBytesWriter and _PyUnicodeWriter have differen use cases. While _PyUnicodeWriter used primary in formatter where resulting size is rarely known and reallocation in decoders usually caused by widening result, _PyBytesWriter is used only in decoders where we usually can estimate a result size or it's upper bound. Resizing happened only in exceptional cases, when error handler called.
The patch contains a special case for writing only one bytes object. This is very unlikely case. It happened only when an encoded string contains only one illegal character. I think this case is not worth a complication and
obfuscation of the code. I think we should drop readonly attribute and a piece of the code (which looks buggy for me anyway). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年04月19日 20:18:53 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, pitrou, vstinner |
| 2013年04月19日 20:18:53 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1366402733.56.0.391953444227.issue17742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年04月19日 20:18:53 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue17742 messages |
| 2013年04月19日 20:18:53 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|