Message186970
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Mark.Shannon, do1, georg.brandl, larry, loewis, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年04月15日.10:01:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1366020107.12.0.809857125019.issue15301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Okay, I got inspired and (in the words of Barry Warsaw) JFDI. Attached is my revised patch. I took Serhiy's patch and reworked it quite a bit:
* I think it's now easier to follow. In particular:
* The most common case (no overflow) is now first. In Serhiy's patch
the most common case is buried in the middle of the second "if".
* I removed some extraneous tests.
* I changed the error messages to call the values "uid" and "gid", to match the names of the parameters.
* I noticed that _fd_converter had the same bad-idea PyFloat_Check, so I changed it to use PyNumber_Index instead.
In the process I also noticed that Serhiy's approach had a resource leak: it never decref'd the result of PyNumber_Index() when successful.
To make sure I duplicated Serhiy's semantics, I had a test harness that ran both his and mine and ensured they returned the same thing (or both threw an error). Obviously I removed all that before cutting the patch. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年04月15日 10:01:47 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, ned.deily, Arfrever, skrah, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, do1 |
| 2013年04月15日 10:01:47 | larry | set | messageid: <1366020107.12.0.809857125019.issue15301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年04月15日 10:01:47 | larry | link | issue15301 messages |
| 2013年04月15日 10:01:46 | larry | create |
|