Message186921
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, lemburg, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, wiml |
| Date |
2013年04月14日.14:28:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1365949718.48.0.795493208532.issue15866@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Should we really invest time to fix bugs related to astral (non-BMP) characters with rare codecs and error handlers (CJK codecs, xmlcharrefreplace error handler)? Python 3.3 is released and has a much better support of astral characters (in many places). I don't know for CJK codecs: Python 3.3 still uses the legacy Unicode API for CJK codecs and so depend on the wchar_t type (which is 16 bits on Windows). I just fixed Python 3.4 to use the new Unicode API (PEP 393), which always support astral characters support and don't depend on the size of the wchar_t type.
I'm not against fixing Python 2.7, I'm just not interested. |
|