Message186818
| Author |
dan.riti |
| Recipients |
ashwch, cvrebert, dan.riti, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, kushal.das, meador.inge, mikehoy, peter.otten, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年04月13日.20:13:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1365884016.69.0.474383002635.issue13510@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
After reading the comments, I generated a patch that does the following:
- Reorganize to present `for line in f:` as the first approach for reading lines. I refrained from saying it's the *preferred* approach, however I can add that if desired.
- Reorganize to present `f.readlines()` as the alternative approach.
Any feedback is more then welcome! Thanks. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年04月13日 20:13:36 | dan.riti | set | recipients:
+ dan.riti, terry.reedy, peter.otten, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, cvrebert, meador.inge, docs@python, mikehoy, kushal.das, ashwch |
| 2013年04月13日 20:13:36 | dan.riti | set | messageid: <1365884016.69.0.474383002635.issue13510@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年04月13日 20:13:36 | dan.riti | link | issue13510 messages |
| 2013年04月13日 20:13:36 | dan.riti | create |
|