Message186484
| Author |
sbt |
| Recipients |
jramnani, neologix, pitrou, sbt |
| Date |
2013年04月10日.09:56:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<5165373B.9030206@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1365571931.39.0.203697855372.issue17684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 10/04/2013 6:32am, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Richard, IIRC, you said somewhere that FD passing failures on OS X
> could be made to work by passing a FD at a time, or something like
> that. What do you think of those faiilures?
I think sending one *array* at a time works as well. These two failures
send two arrays, so they are expected.
(Also, the sending process should wait for some sort of notification
that the receiving process has received the fds before continuing:
closing the socket prematurely causes problems.) |
|