Message185615
| Author |
techtonik |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, bgailer, docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.snow, georg.brandl, nedbat, r.david.murray, techtonik, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年03月31日.05:36:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAPkN8x+iHNspSZgSv4b_tYtM1easB2pYeumx6RLaZ3h_3--RCw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1364706218.66.0.637300961982.issue17546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> ... cannot be relied upon to either happen or not happen...
IMHO this phrase is from Advanced English course.
> The original included the caution against modifying it, and I think it is
valid because of the inconsistent behavior.
> Perhaps it could be weakened to "it is not a good idea to modify"?
Ambiguity already adds fear and uncertainty. Just explaining the
consequences would be good style for the technical doc. |
|