Message185493
| Author |
ned.deily |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti, ned.deily, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年03月29日.07:21:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1364541720.6.0.253082112251.issue17554@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
There definitely needs to be an option to continue to include the normal progress list in the output. This is essential for comparing test runs. I'm +0 on whether it be the default or not. Actually, what is really needed for automated analysis of test runs is getting the complete output of a regrtest run in a standard serialized format, perhaps YAML, including the test name, test result, stdout, and stderr for each test. But that's a separate issue. I've attached a the output from a current OS X run with the proof-of-concept patch. One issue that I see is that there are a number of tests that normally produce messages of various sorts to stderr and/or stdout without the test failing. Suppressing the passed test names makes it difficult to figure out from which tests these messages are coming from. |
|