Message185492
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
donmez, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, matejcik, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年03月29日.06:52:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAH_1eM01fA2ALC_E6Ln-cXe_ctQmG9D6-DncFa1aN_3-3Z0HKQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1364498566.5.0.147462798909.issue12466@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Greg, the original issue was about an OS X failure, and it's still a
problem AFAICT.
However it's definitely not a problem with your patch, but an OS X
kernel bug (we've had another similar issue some time ago I think), so
we might as well skip the offending tests on this OS X version.
As for close() and EINTR, if you plan to do the change, it would
probably be interesting to check if there are other such patterns in
the stdlib. |
|