Message185148
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, rhettinger, tshepang, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年03月24日.18:16:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1364148966.9.0.291246187931.issue17516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Oh, it looks like you are right: useless strings are already removed
> during compilation. But it looks a little bit surprising to me to use a
> multiline string for a comment. I prefer classic # comments.
I was surprised by this as well. I think the comment in _header_value_parser was originally a docstring and got moved around during editing. It should probably get changed to a block comment.
I could have sworn that when I learned about the optimization it was in the context of documentation that specifically said the optimization was done so that triple quoted strings could be used as multi-line comments, but I cannot find it through google or guessing where I might have seen it in our docs, so perhaps I was imagining things. |
|