Message185120
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tshepang, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年03月24日.07:05:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1364108706.36.0.0954691462546.issue13248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> We do not document removals after they are done as they are not an
> issue for back-compatibility (unlike changes and additions).
I learned that people may use the (for example) 2.7 docs even though they are using 2.6, so I think we do want to use things like the deprecated-removed directive to tell these users that they should start looking for a replacement. Removing documentation would lead them to look in other places and discover the removals later. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年03月24日 07:05:06 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, flox, tshepang, python-dev |
| 2013年03月24日 07:05:06 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1364108706.36.0.0954691462546.issue13248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年03月24日 07:05:06 | eric.araujo | link | issue13248 messages |
| 2013年03月24日 07:05:05 | eric.araujo | create |
|