Message184456
| Author |
orsenthil |
| Recipients |
demian.brecht, ezio.melotti, orsenthil, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年03月18日.14:25:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1363616755.23.0.631482346739.issue17272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Sorry for taking long time to respond. full_url has been in the shape it is for many versions, changing it in backwards incompatible way be do more harm than good.
- I would be really interested to know why the present form of full_url presented any limitation for developing an client? Apart from get_full_url there are other ways to get full_url and url associated. Any details on "Why this is must"? The explain snippet below gives the assumption on full_url setting, I could not get need for change from this. Personally, I am 0 to -1 on this too, as in I cannot see a clear need for this change. |
|