Message183847
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Trundle, alex, asvetlov, barry, bfroehle, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, david.villa, dmalcolm, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, jcea, jkloth, larry, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, v+python |
| Date |
2013年03月09日.20:30:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1362861027.75.0.746860611036.issue16612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I've started working on the alternative DSL PEP, but I hit a DSL-independent roadblock:
The preprocessor passes copies of structs to the _impl functions,
which could lead to subtle bugs. I pointed out a benign example on
Rietveld, but in general I think this should not be done.
So the question is whether to add another flag or symbol that
determines if a pointer should be passed to the _impl function. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年03月09日 20:30:27 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, gvanrossum, barry, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, larry, eric.smith, jkloth, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, v+python, alex, Trundle, asvetlov, dmalcolm, daniel.urban, chris.jerdonek, Jim.Jewett, serhiy.storchaka, bfroehle, david.villa |
| 2013年03月09日 20:30:27 | skrah | set | messageid: <1362861027.75.0.746860611036.issue16612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年03月09日 20:30:27 | skrah | link | issue16612 messages |
| 2013年03月09日 20:30:27 | skrah | create |
|