Message183754
| Author |
giampaolo.rodola |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, rosslagerwall |
| Date |
2013年03月08日.19:03:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1362769406.78.0.463645298669.issue13564@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Because offsets can be negative
On Linux (and presumably on all POSIX platforms) passing a negative offset results in EINVAL.
> In that case, there's a problem with the patch, since select can block
> arbitrarily long because it doesn't take the socket timeout into
> account.
Right. I will fix that.
> Also, apparently socket.sendall() doesn't retry on EAGAIN,
> it doesn't use BEGIN_SELECT_LOOP.
socket.sendall() is not supposed to return EAGAIN in the first place. And again, I don't see how this is related with the issue at hand.
> I'm leaving this topic, you can do as you like...
Bye. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年03月08日 19:03:26 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, eric.araujo, rosslagerwall |
| 2013年03月08日 19:03:26 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1362769406.78.0.463645298669.issue13564@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年03月08日 19:03:26 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue13564 messages |
| 2013年03月08日 19:03:26 | giampaolo.rodola | create |
|