Message183617
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
Trundle, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten |
| Date |
2013年03月06日.21:57:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAH_1eM0JjSvc0=B1APkOF5sY4510QaEh9SJvk+R+gZm7EjUSsw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<5137A2EA.9030304@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Content |
> IIRC Nick Coghlan had put a bit of work into this a few months ago as an
> external module with a view to seeing if it got traction before putting
> anything into the stdlib. Might be worth pinging him, or looking to see
> what he'd done. Can't remember the keywords to search for, I'm afraid.
> Something like "directory walker"
Nick's walkdir is "just" an improved walk - with a lot of added
functionality, like filtering etc.
But it's still based on os.walk(), which in turn uses listdir(), since
it's currently the only way to list the content of a directory. So in
short, it won't help for this issue.
To limit the memory usage, on would have to have to use an iterator
based on readdir(). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年03月06日 21:57:45 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, loewis, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, socketpair, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013年03月06日 21:57:45 | neologix | link | issue11406 messages |
| 2013年03月06日 21:57:45 | neologix | create |
|