Message183273
| Author |
brett.cannon |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, erik.bray, pitrou |
| Date |
2013年03月01日.18:56:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1362164202.77.0.232925412937.issue17330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
[for anyone else who doesn't know what st_nlink is for: http://docs.python.org/3/library/stat.html#stat.ST_NLINK]
Since it doesn't add stat overhead as it's just part of what os.path.stats() returns I'm fine with adding it to part of the invalidation scheme. What do you think, Antoine? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年03月01日 18:56:42 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, pitrou, erik.bray |
| 2013年03月01日 18:56:42 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1362164202.77.0.232925412937.issue17330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年03月01日 18:56:42 | brett.cannon | link | issue17330 messages |
| 2013年03月01日 18:56:42 | brett.cannon | create |
|