Message183134
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年02月27日.11:02:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<578362145.67683000.1361962932481.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<1361957114.87.0.0152851470776.issue16930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Why must we mention graft at all? I've never had a need for it. It
> seems simpler and just as effective to run `hg import` on the
> original patch.
`hg graft` actually works in some cases where `hg import` will fail,
because grafting uses the merge logic (so, for example, it is able to
recognize that some files were renamed between branches). |
|