Message182954
| Author |
gmwils |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, barry, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ghaering, gmwils, gpolo, michael.foord, r.david.murray, rhettinger, tarek, theller |
| Date |
2013年02月25日.16:04:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1361808261.4.0.44737174696.issue10572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Odd. I must be doing something wrong. My test workflow was:
1. hg mv <a> <b>
1a. modify files to resolve issues from the move
2. hg diff > issueNNNN.patch # attached
3. hg revert --all
4. patch -p1 < issueNNNN.patch
Reading the hg docs more, I should have used 'hg patch issueNNNN.patch'. However trying that on a trivial file move, results in a delete/create still. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年02月25日 16:04:21 | gmwils | set | recipients:
+ gmwils, barry, brett.cannon, theller, rhettinger, ghaering, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, tarek, gpolo, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, asvetlov |
| 2013年02月25日 16:04:21 | gmwils | set | messageid: <1361808261.4.0.44737174696.issue10572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年02月25日 16:04:21 | gmwils | link | issue10572 messages |
| 2013年02月25日 16:04:21 | gmwils | create |
|