Message181875
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date |
2013年02月11日.07:06:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1360566216.3442.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> It seems like the last patch (subtests5.patch) dropped the parameter
> data from the failure output as described in the docs. For example,
> the example in the docs yields the following:
>
> FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest)
Weird, since there are unit tests for that. I'll take a look. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年02月11日 07:06:45 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, hpk, flox, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013年02月11日 07:06:45 | pitrou | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013年02月11日 07:06:45 | pitrou | create |
|