Message181871
| Author |
chris.jerdonek |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date |
2013年02月11日.03:37:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It seems like the last patch (subtests5.patch) dropped the parameter data from the failure output as described in the docs. For example, the example in the docs yields the following:
FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest)
instead of the documented:
FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest) (i=1)
subtests4.patch is okay. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年02月11日 03:37:34 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, flox, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013年02月11日 03:37:34 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年02月11日 03:37:34 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013年02月11日 03:37:34 | chris.jerdonek | create |
|