Message181298
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, gvanrossum, nedbat, pitrou, techtonik, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年02月03日.20:56:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1359924992.96.0.769514366269.issue7083@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Anatoly, please stop playing with the headers. It is meaningless and irritating, especially when you set them wrong. The 3.5 choice is for issues that will *not* apply before then. An example is actually making a change warned about in a deprecation warning. 3.2 will soon see its last regular bugfix release. The main purpose of the headers is to help developers develop and apply a patch. The secondary purpose is serve as history and to inform users.
As I explained in my email to you
1. The OP meant for this to be a code bug report.
2. This was properly closed as an invalid bug report. So there will be no code patch. So the headers have no use except as history.
3. I do believe the doc should be changed, *and* I believe it should be a new issue. If I do open one, I will try to remember to add it here as superseder. |
|