Message181068
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date |
2013年02月01日.03:59:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1359691194.48.0.317375601725.issue14468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The point is to allow a manageable discussion to take place around
> points of contention
That can be done as (possibly inline) comments on bitbucket on the individual commits.
> while making forward commit progress along the way.
I'm not sure how you intend to do that, but feel free to propose what you have in mind. As I see it, there's a bunch of text written assuming that there is a single clone or multiple not shared clones, and all this needs to be replaced and updated. You can probably extract a couple of chunks, but that won't make a difference IMHO.
> the current massive batch of changes makes it too unwieldy.
Maybe you are overestimating it. It's really not so massive: it's 8 changesets, 2 just remove stuff, other 2 just move existing content without adding/removing anything (so there's nothing much to review here). Of the remaining 4 changesets, the first only adds 85 lines, the other 3 change about 20 lines each. |
|