Message180603
| Author |
klankschap |
| Recipients |
klankschap, peter.otten, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, skrah |
| Date |
2013年01月25日.18:16:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<F7CEBDA3-5CEB-4C4C-A032-FBC13DEDEC60@klankschap.nl> |
| In-reply-to |
<1359108466.81.0.706104683417.issue17020@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:07, Stefan Krah wrote:
>
> Stefan Krah added the comment:
>
>> It is in the combination with jumpahead(), getstate(), setstate() that you'll experience random() to produce values >= 1.0
>
> Let me reiterate what David said: Can you post a self-contained program
> that exhibits the issue?
My program is sort of complex in the meaning of multiple processes interleaving and interacting via a priorityqueue.
Each individual steps through multiple classes which all should stay independent.
No simple short snippet.
From what i understand is that issue14591 was able to reproduce the same feature as it seems related to the jumpahead() malfunctioning.
.F |
|