homepage

> I thought SOCK_DGRAM messages just got truncated at the receiving end.
You were referring to partial writes: for a datagram-oriented
protocol, if the datagram can't be sent atomically (in one
send()/write() call), the kernel will return EAGAIN. On the receiving
side, it will get truncated is the buffer is too small.
Going back to the subject: so what do we say, let's just forget about
supporting WSAPoll at all (both in CPython and tulip)?
If we ever choose to export it, I think the least we should do would
be to not export it as select.poll(): since it has - not so subtle -
semantic differences with poll(), code using previously select() on
Windows may silently break when poll() is suddenly available: e.g.
asyncore with use_poll=True would probably deadlock in case of
unreachable host, if WSAPoll doesn't report connect() failures.
When I see the hoops Richard had to go through to make WSAPoll usable
in tulip, my gut feeling is that exposing it wouldn't be making a
favor to poor unsuspecting Windows programmers :-\