Message180322
| Author |
sbt |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, jcea, pitrou, sbt, trent |
| Date |
2013年01月20日.21:54:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1358718891.82.0.584853974572.issue16507@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> That compiles (after hacking the line endings). One Tulip test fails,
> PollEventLooptests.testSockClientFail. But that's probably because the
> PollSelector class hasn't been adjusted for Windows yet (need to dig this
> out of the Pollster code that was deleted when switching to neologix's
> Selector).
Sorry I did not deal with this earlier. I can make the modifications to PollSelector tommorrow.
Just to describe the horrible hack: every time poll() needs to be called we first check if there are any registered async connects. If so then I first use select([], [], connectors) to detect any failed connections, and then use poll() normally.
This does mean that to detect failed connections we must never use too large a timeout with poll() when there are outstanding connects. Of course one must decide what is an acceptable maximum timeout -- too short and you might damage battery life, too long and you will not get prompt notification of failures. |
|