Message180255
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, kynan, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date |
2013年01月19日.19:28:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1358623525.3619.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1358606971.41.0.253488148199.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I think we're going to have to separate out two counts in the metrics
> - the total number of tests (the current counts), and the total number
> of subtests (the executed subtest blocks).
This is a reasonable proposal. On the other hand, it was already the
case that a single test could count for several failures (for example,
an exception in the test method and another in tearDown). Therefore, I
think it is independent from the subtest proposal and could be tackled
separately (which would also help keep this issue focussed :-)). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年01月19日 19:28:05 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, kynan, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013年01月19日 19:28:05 | pitrou | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013年01月19日 19:28:03 | pitrou | create |
|