Message179303
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年01月08日.01:55:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1357610156.97.0.171054866653.issue13229@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The problem with the current walkdir implementation is that without a rich path object you end up making a lot of redundant system calls. Combined with the inherent overhead of nested generators, it just *feels* bad (even in situations where worrying about the speed is truly a case of premature optimisation)
The caching in pathlib should deal with the problem of redundant system calls, so rebasing walkdir on top of that would probably be a good idea (i.e. all walkdir APIs would produce pathlib paths, and implicit convert strings they encounter to paths). |
|