Message179217
| Author |
dabeaz |
| Recipients |
Ronny.Pfannschmidt, alex, asvetlov, cvrebert, dabeaz, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, josmiley, ncoghlan, torsten, 猫.黒 |
| Date |
2013年01月06日.20:20:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1357503616.56.0.972176154814.issue14965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Just as a note, there is a distinct possibility that a "property" in a superclass could be some other kind of descriptor object that's not a property. To handle that case, the solution of
super(self.__class__, self.__class__).x.fset(self, value)
would actually have to be rewritten as
super(self.__class__, self.__class__).x.__set__(self, value)
That said, I agree it would be nice to have a simplified means of accomplishing this. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年01月06日 20:20:16 | dabeaz | set | recipients:
+ dabeaz, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, alex, cvrebert, asvetlov, daniel.urban, torsten, josmiley, Ronny.Pfannschmidt, 猫.黒 |
| 2013年01月06日 20:20:16 | dabeaz | set | messageid: <1357503616.56.0.972176154814.issue14965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年01月06日 20:20:16 | dabeaz | link | issue14965 messages |
| 2013年01月06日 20:20:16 | dabeaz | create |
|