Message178428
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, terry.reedy, zach.ware |
| Date |
2012年12月28日.21:12:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1356729169.76.0.994281900399.issue16748@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That sounds right to me.
Note that PEP 399 is following older conventions that were laid down in a time when unittest did not *have* test discovery, so this is a new paradigm we'd like to move to (for the reasons Brett mentioned), and it may take a while to get there. It applies to more than just the python/C accelerator distinction; it applies any time a base class plus specialized classes are used to construct test cases. (I do this a bunch in the email tests, for example, and that has no accelerator.) |
|