Message178378
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年12月28日.10:11:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1356689463.31.0.226007392897.issue16772@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The only difference with previous code is that now OverflowError raised > for large bases instead of ValueError.
Serhiy: can you clarify this remark? Where do you see the OverflowError? The current exception and message look fine to me, so maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're talking about:
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:1b2134a78c17, Dec 28 2012, 10:06:47)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> int('34', base=2**100)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: int() base must be >= 2 and <= 36
[66206 refs, 23451 blocks]
I actually think this issue can be closed as fixed: the current code looks fine to me, and I don't think the fix should be backported. |
|