Message177685
| Author |
hynek |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, hynek |
| Date |
2012年12月18日.12:14:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<46F8AC14-E23F-4C90-ACCD-92CC84A8BFA0@ox.cx> |
| In-reply-to |
<1355829032.34.0.906422381203.issue16706@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I think deprecation makes not big value.
> We should continue aliases support and there are no place to raise warning.
> What we can do — mention deprecation in the doc.
That’s what I meant. I saw it in shutil code, were confused, looked it up, wondered why it exists. I would like to get rid of it.
Do you have any concrete plans or should I just wade through shutil and make it pretty for 3.4?
> The reason to get rid of other OSError aliases to make cleaner code (especially considering situations like `except (os.error, IOError):` and use best practices in stdlib.
Sure.
> I think the later is very important because stdlib is first class example of coding style for many users.
I hope not. :-/
> After stdlib we can cleanup C code to that unification and use concrete exception classes instead of errno checking (#16705).
Awesome. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年12月18日 12:14:07 | hynek | set | recipients:
+ hynek, asvetlov |
| 2012年12月18日 12:14:07 | hynek | link | issue16706 messages |
| 2012年12月18日 12:14:05 | hynek | create |
|