Message176008
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年11月20日.17:02:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<438438233.251416713.1353430926099.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<1353404403.85.0.824767724161.issue16475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> However, even if you cannot agree that it is a good idea, can you
> explain to me how it is a BAD idea? How can expanding object
> references to strings to all objects, using the same mechanism, be
> bad?
It is a bad idea because features have to be supported in the long-term,
which means more maintenance effort. So, basically, this is the same
reason we don't accept every feature request + patch that gets posted
to the tracker.
And, again, I think the string interning part is a good thing. |
|