Message175577
| Author |
chris.jerdonek |
| Recipients |
Juraj.Variny, bethard, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年11月14日.17:13:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352913239.92.0.228955714328.issue16418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
For maintenance releases, I think I would favor abbreviating the list only if it is "lossless" (e.g. for xrange objects). I think I would also be okay with abbreviating for arbitrary xranges -- in particular for arbitrary steps. For example, for xrange(0, 50, 3), I think something like the following might be better: "0, 3, 6, 9, ... 45, 48" (we could also include a difference hint). |
|