Message175388
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
Juraj.Variny, bethard, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年11月11日.19:55:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352663705.72.0.543471051014.issue16418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I am arguing that (x)range *should* be usable for large numbers of options *because* the containment test is O(1). What happens is you *do* use xrange instead of range in 2.7 or 3.x instead of 2.7?
In 2.x, range(n) *is* a list so that is a bad choice for large n, regardless of the display issue, which could be fixed separately as is being done on other issues. |
|