Message175314
| Author |
mcjeff |
| Recipients |
akira, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jhylton, mcjeff, nadeem.vawda, neologix, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, techtonik |
| Date |
2012年11月11日.04:31:48 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352608309.01.0.835552644231.issue10050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Reverting of the len(block) back to 'bs' here aside, does it even make sense to include block information at all?
That's the attempted read size, so it might not be an accurate representation of the size of the data actually read. Thus the reason for the initial change. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年11月11日 04:31:49 | mcjeff | set | recipients:
+ mcjeff, jhylton, orsenthil, pitrou, techtonik, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, neologix, akira, python-dev |
| 2012年11月11日 04:31:49 | mcjeff | set | messageid: <1352608309.01.0.835552644231.issue10050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年11月11日 04:31:48 | mcjeff | link | issue10050 messages |
| 2012年11月11日 04:31:48 | mcjeff | create |
|