Message175098
| Author |
arigo |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, Vlado.Boza, alex, arigo, benjamin.peterson, camara, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, koniiiik, lemburg, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年11月07日.13:02:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352293325.28.0.761541391846.issue14621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Wrong, sorry. On a 32-bit Python 2.7, "(2**32-1)*n" has the same hash -2, for any value of n.
Of course if you build a dict containing thousands of such integers as keys, then right now you get unexpectedly bad performance. I wonder if I should open another bug report about that --- the hash of longs should be slightly more random-looking... |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年11月07日 13:02:05 | arigo | set | recipients:
+ arigo, lemburg, mark.dickinson, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, alex, dmalcolm, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, serhiy.storchaka, Vlado.Boza, koniiiik, camara |
| 2012年11月07日 13:02:05 | arigo | set | messageid: <1352293325.28.0.761541391846.issue14621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年11月07日 13:02:05 | arigo | link | issue14621 messages |
| 2012年11月07日 13:02:05 | arigo | create |
|