Message175096
| Author |
arigo |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, Vlado.Boza, alex, arigo, benjamin.peterson, camara, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, koniiiik, lemburg, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年11月07日.12:54:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352292899.75.0.539878888741.issue14621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I won't try to influence the outcome of this discussion, but I'd like to correct myself: in the measures I posted, "true randomness" is not needed at all. The exact criterion might be hard to pin down, but as a first approximation, we get the same answers as long as most keys have different hashes, as all the bits of the hash are used by the dict lookup in only a few iterations. No two small ints have the same hash, by construction. You can build a sequence of (long) integers that have all exactly the same hash, but doing that is not as easy as "2**k". |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年11月07日 12:54:59 | arigo | set | recipients:
+ arigo, lemburg, mark.dickinson, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, alex, dmalcolm, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, serhiy.storchaka, Vlado.Boza, koniiiik, camara |
| 2012年11月07日 12:54:59 | arigo | set | messageid: <1352292899.75.0.539878888741.issue14621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年11月07日 12:54:59 | arigo | link | issue14621 messages |
| 2012年11月07日 12:54:59 | arigo | create |
|