Message175031
| Author |
nadeem.vawda |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, nadeem.vawda, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年11月06日.23:34:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352244852.4.0.0777037962578.issue16350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know
> what behavior is correct.
Ah, sorry. I assumed you were going to submit a separate patch to fix the
unconsumed_tail issues.
> Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets
> to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b''
> after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush().
Did you perhaps forget to attach the patch? The only ones I see are those
that you uploaded last week. |
|