Message174910
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, nadeem.vawda, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年11月05日.13:58:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352123927.0.0.474792282563.issue16350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know what behavior is correct.
Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b'' after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush().
I a little changed test for the previous case (here was O(N^2) for large data). I checked it on non-fixed Python, bug was catched. |
|