Message174793
| Author |
rhdv |
| Recipients |
pitrou, r.david.murray, rhdv, serhiy.storchaka, shashank |
| Date |
2012年11月04日.13:20:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352035220.65.0.948092193536.issue10030@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
My use case is decrypting files of 100's of megabytes. This is so slow that it is quite useless. About an hour or so.
I do agree that the encryption is worthless, but that is not important for my use case where I want to discourage people from reverse engineering the contents.
If it is so dangerous as some people have pointed out, it should be removed at the cost of not supporting a standard feature of ZIP files.
In my opinion you either support a feature and you support it good (efficient) or you don't. As it stands now, users will be disappointed in using a supported feature.
Some people argue that adding C code to Python is dangerous as it will lead to bugs, vulnerabilities etc.
You could dismiss every addition with C code to Python with this argument, so there must be some positive aspects to outweigh the negative side. The negative side is fairly small (50 lines of very simple C code), plus some standard Python glue code.
The benefit is a 100 fold increase in performance and the removal of 1 line of documentation telling that this feature is extremely slow.
(patch attached) |
|