Message174777
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, ag6502, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, francismb, ggenellina, ncoghlan, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年11月04日.10:51:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1352026269.3394.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1352021825.95.0.66102577565.issue5765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Autogenerated code could easily hit the 1000 term limit - if anything,
> I'd be inclined to set it *higher* than 4 rather than lower, as
> breaking previously working code in a maintenance release is a bad
> thing, regardless of our opinion of the sanity of that code.
We can simply apply the 1000 limit in Python 3.4 and mark the bug as
won't fix in other versions.
I don't think adding a scaling factor just to cope with hypothetical
silly code is a good thing in the long term. |
|