Message174416
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, ezio.melotti, facundobatista, loewis, mark.dickinson, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, zach.ware |
| Date |
2012年11月01日.13:27:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1351776435.32.0.261910224635.issue13701@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I just wanted to ensure that there wouldn't be any bugs by my patch.
Okay, understood. Thanks.
Please note that this issue is now closed, though: the 2.3 compatibility workarounds have been dealt with. The use or non-use of dummy_threading has nothing to do with 2.3 compatibility and so is out of scope for the issue. You should feel free to open a new issue if there's a demonstrable problem or demonstrable room for improvement w.r.t. the way dummy threading is handled. (I'm personally not convinced that either of those is true, but others may have different views.) |
|