Message174407
| Author |
Ramchandra Apte |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, ezio.melotti, facundobatista, loewis, mark.dickinson, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, zach.ware |
| Date |
2012年11月01日.12:26:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAExgZOhWpK25bcAjGsC=Mg9_r-Sx_TdU1y0Mhs915Dm8eFVMLQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<20121101114228.GA6012@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| Content |
On 1 November 2012 17:12, Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Stefan Krah added the comment:
>
> Ramchandra Apte <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > > I'm not quite sure why you're quoting the docs at me. What's the point
> > > you want to make?
> >
> > Does decimal use the dummy_threading module where
> > deadlock might occur from a thread being created that blocks waiting for
> > another thread to be created?
>
> The modus operandi on the issue tracker is generally like this:
>
> For finished modules like decimal you need to provide a concrete example
> that triggers an alleged misbehavior. The reason is simple: In general
> no one has time for open-ended questions like the one you asked.
>
> Also, such questions are perfectly on-topic on python-list.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13701>
> _______________________________________
>
I just wanted to ensure that there wouldn't be any bugs by my patch. |
|