Message174402
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, ezio.melotti, facundobatista, loewis, mark.dickinson, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, zach.ware |
| Date |
2012年11月01日.11:42:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20121101114228.GA6012@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAExgZOi4p4as0MxNj0FFpnVcPrbsLHPNqy6h5U+W5KwdbdBozA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
Ramchandra Apte <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure why you're quoting the docs at me. What's the point
> > you want to make?
>
> Does decimal use the dummy_threading module where
> deadlock might occur from a thread being created that blocks waiting for
> another thread to be created?
The modus operandi on the issue tracker is generally like this:
For finished modules like decimal you need to provide a concrete example
that triggers an alleged misbehavior. The reason is simple: In general
no one has time for open-ended questions like the one you asked.
Also, such questions are perfectly on-topic on python-list. |
|