Message174393
| Author |
Ramchandra Apte |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, ezio.melotti, facundobatista, loewis, mark.dickinson, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, zach.ware |
| Date |
2012年11月01日.07:15:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAExgZOjT02H7qKtsJYb8dm0+r40wW1d4yyzKBtRdCK4NwR8_pA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1351706395.33.0.744400978394.issue13701@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 31 October 2012 23:29, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Mark Dickinson added the comment:
>
> Fixed the unuse of decorator syntax. I think the dummy_threading changes
> should be considered a separate issue.
>
> With regards to the patch: I assume you mean "import dummy_threading as
> threading" rather than just "import dummy_threading". Also, it looks to me
> as though test_decimal would need updating too to do the correct thing when
> the threading module isn't present.
>
> Closing this issue as fixed; please open a new issue for the
> dummy_threading if you think it's worth pursuing.
>
> ----------
> assignee: rhettinger -> mark.dickinson
> resolution: -> fixed
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13701>
> _______________________________________
>
In the docs for dummy_threading, "Be careful to not use this module where
deadlock might occur from a thread being created that blocks waiting for
another thread to be created. This often occurs with blocking I/O." |
|