Message173230
| Author |
Want to Delete This Account |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, Want to Delete This Account, gpolo |
| Date |
2012年10月18日.04:55:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAExgZOifKPifLH+7wu7tBgMRJxhOpCvXtB+i+NogLS-MkALVmg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1350497765.87.0.914034657546.issue16248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 17 October 2012 23:46, Guilherme Polo <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Guilherme Polo added the comment:
>
> It is a well known fact that the readprofile function uses exec, and it
> has been like that for more than 18 years. The parameters baseName and
> className defines the execution of the files $HOME/.{className}.tcl,
> $HOME/.{className}.py, $HOME/.{baseName}.tcl, and $HOME/.{baseName}.py. The
> function's docstring actually say that.
>
> Said that, I never needed to load custom code during the creation of a Tk
> instance. To me the existence of readprofile is unneeded.
>
> But what is your proposal to the issue ?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16248>
> _______________________________________
>
Simply remove the readprofile code (it is not documented and I never had to
use it) |
|