Message 173191 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	gpolo
Recipients	Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, gpolo
Date	2012年10月17日.18:16:05
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1350497765.87.0.914034657546.issue16248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
It is a well known fact that the readprofile function uses exec, and it has been like that for more than 18 years. The parameters baseName and className defines the execution of the files $HOME/.{className}.tcl, $HOME/.{className}.py, $HOME/.{baseName}.tcl, and $HOME/.{baseName}.py. The function's docstring actually say that. Said that, I never needed to load custom code during the creation of a Tk instance. To me the existence of readprofile is unneeded. But what is your proposal to the issue ?

Content

It is a well known fact that the readprofile function uses exec, and it has been like that for more than 18 years. The parameters baseName and className defines the execution of the files $HOME/.{className}.tcl, $HOME/.{className}.py, $HOME/.{baseName}.tcl, and $HOME/.{baseName}.py. The function's docstring actually say that.
Said that, I never needed to load custom code during the creation of a Tk instance. To me the existence of readprofile is unneeded.
But what is your proposal to the issue ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年10月17日 18:16:05	gpolo	set	recipients: + gpolo, Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte
2012年10月17日 18:16:05	gpolo	set	messageid: <1350497765.87.0.914034657546.issue16248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年10月17日 18:16:05	gpolo	link	issue16248 messages
2012年10月17日 18:16:05	gpolo	create

homepage